Content note: comments are quoted as written. Some contain insults, racist or sectarian language, or calls to violence. Discursa reports them because they are part of the conversation it measures; it does not endorse them. Whether to remove such content is a moderation decision for the platform and the page.
The leading positions both tell migrants to stay away: 23% of items hold that foreign residents and refugees should avoid the protests to escape legal risk and deportation, and 15% hold that migrants owe Germany gratitude and loyalty. The first leads the second by 7 points. By contrast, 6% of items hold that taking part is a democratic right. Based on the positions people hold, 45% of items hold a position opposing the protests, and 5% hold a position supporting them and none opposing. About 110 of the 1,131 items against only thank, bless or respect Germany and do not mention the protests; without them the share against is about 41%. A further 40% of items hold none of the listed positions. By this report's reading of their stored text, 8 of the 15 posts warned migrants about the protests or aired calls to stay away. They hold 1,756 of the 2,489 items read for positions, 51% of which hold a position against, compared with 32% of the 733 under the other seven. These are comments from people who chose to reply to 15 posts, so they do not represent any wider public.
% of items holding each position, of the 2,489 read for positions. A comment can hold more than one, so the bars do not sum to 100%.
Derived from the positions people hold, using the analyst's tags of which positions support and which oppose the youth protests planned in Germany for 31 October 2026; the model is never asked. 1% hold positions on both sides, 9% only positions that are neither, and 40% no listed position.
Among the positions held by 30 items or more, those in which more than 15% of items imply the position rather than state it in the comment itself are: "Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation" in 54% of its items; "Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany" in 21% of its items; "Participation is a legitimate democratic right and a way to address real socio-economic grievances" in 25% of its items; "The protests will likely lead to widespread violence and riots similar to those in France" in 19% of its items. 190 items (8%) hold a view not on the list (156 of them hold no listed position), among them, in no order of size: "Angela Merkel is responsible for the crimes and victims resulting from her decision to open Germany's borders"; "Anyone who causes destruction in Germany should be arrested immediately by the authorities"; "Anyone who causes harm should be punished".
| Position | Abdulkader Alshekh (53) | DW Arabic (DW عربية) (146) | Furat Shibli (70) | Ja genau (51) | Khaled Bozan (686) | MaroWeltShow - أخبار ألمانيا مارو (156) | Nebras Akeel (294) | Germany News (اخبار المانيا) (93) | Hamburg Nachrichten (56) | Integration and Life in Germany (الاندماج والحياة في ألمانيا) (103) | Arab and Syrian Community in Germany (الجالية العربية و السورية في ألمانيا) (56) | Syrer in Essen (156) | Abdullah al-Dimashqi (عبدالله الدمشقي) (541) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation | 58% | 3% | 7% | 2% | 17% | 13% | 35% | 28% | 23% | 11% | 9% | 6% | 40% |
| Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany | 15% | 2% | 4% | 2% | 28% | 21% | 3% | 14% | 13% | 6% | 9% | 10% | 16% |
| Migrants, Syrians or Arabs are criminal or destructive and should be deported or go home | 8% | 7% | 10% | 2% | 2% | 6% | 7% | 12% | 18% | 9% | 21% | 10% | 16% |
| The protests are a dangerous trap designed to incite violence and smear the reputation of migrants | 11% | 7% | 9% | 8% | 13% | 9% | 11% | 13% | 2% | 6% | 9% | 3% | 4% |
| Participation is a legitimate democratic right and a way to address real socio-economic grievances | 2% | 8% | 9% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 10% | 17% | 5% | 7% | 4% | 9% | 1% |
| Opposes the youth protests planned in Germany for 31 October 2026, without giving a reason | 2% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 7% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 4% | 12% | 7% | 0% | 1% |
| Against, derived | 75% | 18% | 27% | 20% | 55% | 40% | 47% | 46% | 41% | 36% | 29% | 17% | 58% |
| In favour, derived | 2% | 8% | 9% | 6% | 5% | 2% | 9% | 17% | 5% | 9% | 5% | 9% | 1% |
Share of each source's own items; sources under 30 items are left out. The table shows the largest positions, and any other whose share of a source's own items the text gives.
| Period | Items | Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation | Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany | Migrants, Syrians or Arabs are criminal or destructive and should be deported or go home | The protests are a dangerous trap designed to incite violence and smear the reputation of migrants | The protests will likely lead to widespread violence and riots similar to those in France |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 October 2026 | 39 | 0% | 3% | 3% | 8% | 10% |
| 21 October 2026 | 452 | 13% | 13% | 5% | 10% | 5% |
| 22 October 2026 | 838 | 20% | 23% | 6% | 11% | 3% |
| 23 October 2026 | 410 | 28% | 15% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 24 October 2026 | 466 | 36% | 7% | 10% | 10% | 2% |
| 25 October 2026 | 284 | 18% | 12% | 10% | 3% | 1% |
By day, audience items whose positions were read and that carry a date; periods with fewer than 30 items are left out. The page whose posts hold most of the items is not the same every day, so a change between days can be a change of page rather than of opinion.
Comments are quoted as written; see the content note in the Summary.
One comment for each of the leading positions, long ones shortened here; every quoted comment is in the appendix, whole.
% of the 2,489 items counted · tone of the item
Neutral items make up 37% of items. 352 of the 913 hold no listed position, and the rest argue that foreign residents and refugees should stay away from the protests to avoid legal trouble and deportation, that the protests are a trap meant to provoke violence and smear migrants, and that migrants owe Germany gratitude and loyalty. Others defend joining as a democratic right to raise real grievances such as housing, hospitals and jobs, or warn that the far right (AfD) will use the protests against migrants. Their tone stays calm and matter-of-fact, in advice, questions and short agreement. Positive items, 35% of items: 332 of the 873 hold no listed position, and the rest back the call for foreign residents and refugees to stay out of the protests, and back the idea that migrants owe Germany gratitude, in warm words of thanks, respect and prayers for the speaker and for Germany. Negative items, 28% of items: 305 of the 703 hold no listed position, more than half of them quarrels among commenters (about 85), attacks on the pages and their stay-home or loyalty appeals (about 65) or on one of the two guests in DW Arabic's video (about 25); the items holding a position centre on claims that migrants, Syrians or Arabs are criminal or destructive and should be sent home, and on the view that the protests are a trap meant to provoke violence and damage migrants' reputation, voiced in curses, mockery and contempt.
% of items · theme (one item may carry multiple themes)
"Cost of Living" is added to the chart because the findings cite it; it falls outside the themes it would otherwise show.
Not charted, at 0.5% of items or more: Right Wing Politics (4%), Education Investment (1%).
In this theme, 60% of items hold the position that migrants owe Germany gratitude and loyalty and should therefore stay away from the protests; about 110 of these 351 only thank, bless or respect Germany. Commenters pray that God protects Germany and its people, say they will never forget what the country did for them, and call on everyone to avoid "denying a favour". Some say Germany gave refugees what no one else did and that those who want to repay it should help it keep its security and peace. A further 26% of items in this theme hold that foreign residents and refugees should stay away from the protests; 71 of these 154 only imply it, mostly by thanking or praising a post that warned them, and about 30 carry a word of legal or practical risk. One commenter says Germany backed Syrians to the last minute, for years from their arrival until they were naturalised, so they should stay in their homes and families should keep their children in. Smaller groups hold other views. 4% of items in this theme call migrants criminal or destructive and say they should go home, with one commenter calling Syrians an "ungrateful people". Another 4% of items in this theme call the protests a trap meant to provoke violence and smear migrants. Some reject the idea of owing Germany anything, saying they are citizens who pay taxes rather than guests; one says no European country did refugees any favour.
In this theme, 23% of items hold that migrants, Syrians or Arabs are criminal or destructive and should be deported or go home. Commenters in this group call them thieves, one calls them "sleeper cells" of terrorists with no loyalty to Germany, and some tell them to go back to their own country. A further 19% of items in this theme say foreign residents and refugees should stay away from the protests to avoid legal trouble and deportation. Another 15% of items in this theme call the protests a trap meant to provoke violence and smear migrants. These commenters fear that outsiders will turn up waving the Syrian flag and cause damage in the name of Syrians. A separate 14% of items in this theme say migrants owe Germany gratitude and loyalty, and one commenter promises to defend the country on behalf of honourable Syrians.
In this theme, 37% of items tell foreign residents and refugees to stay away from the protests to avoid legal trouble and deportation. Commenters write short warnings such as "nobody should go out to protest", and some thank the page and pray that the day passes without problems. A further 22% of items in this theme say migrants owe Germany gratitude and loyalty, so staying home is the right thing to do. Another 21% of items in this theme call the protests a trap. Some of these commenters predict that Syrian flags will appear and the media will then blame Syrians, and some claim outsiders will carry those flags to frame migrants. 17% of items in this theme defend taking part as a democratic right. One of them argues that people blame refugees whenever prices, taxes or the minimum wage come up, so refugees have every reason to join. One says that if people had feared protests, they would not be in Europe.
34% of items in this theme argue the protests are a trap meant to provoke violence and smear migrants. Commenters warn that organisers are luring Arabs into a setup. Those who name someone most often name the far right or Israel or "the Zionists", and others name the US or Russia; some put it in antisemitic terms. Some predict that someone will turn up waving a Syrian flag, and that this will be used against all migrants. Others say foreigners will be blamed even if they stay home. 16% of items in this theme say migrants, Syrians or Arabs are criminal or destructive and should go home. One writer posted the same reply five times, each to a commenter who had defended protesting: he calls each an "agent" luring Arabs into the abyss, says citizenship or a residence permit does not entitle them to protest, and tells them to go back to their country if they dislike Germany. A further 13% of items in this theme tell foreign residents and refugees to stay away to avoid legal risk and deportation. Another 10% of items in this theme say the far right, including the AfD, will use any incident to blame all of Germany's problems on migrants.
Comments in this theme centre on telling migrants to stay home on the day. 28% of items in this theme say foreign residents and refugees should not take part, to avoid legal trouble and deportation. Commenters give practical advice: keep the children indoors and stay off camera, and one says to stay away even from the supermarket until the day passes. A further 20% of items in this theme say migrants owe Germany gratitude and loyalty, thank it for its hospitality, ask God to protect it, and call for safety and security to be kept. 16% of items in this theme call the protests a trap meant to provoke violence and smear migrants' reputation. 10% of items in this theme predict riots like those in France. 14% of items in this theme oppose the protests without giving a reason, and one commenter of Syrian origin says they reject any unrest that threatens Germany's stability. Others call for harsh action: some demand that anyone inciting violence be expelled at once, and several call for violence against protesters, from the police crushing their heads to live ammunition and opening fire on anyone who is not German; those named here are on the violent-language risk card.
% of items · narrative frame used (one item may use multiple)
Not charted, at 0.5% of items or more: Religious Citation (1%), Appeal to Expertise (1%).
| Position | Most used frames among its holders |
|---|---|
| Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation | Moral Condemnation 26%; Blessing or Greeting 24%; Plea or Demand 14% |
| Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany | Moral Condemnation 49%; Blessing or Greeting 25%; Personal Testimony 16% |
| Migrants, Syrians or Arabs are criminal or destructive and should be deported or go home | Moral Condemnation 41%; Insult and Abuse 21%; Sarcasm and Ridicule 19% |
| The protests are a dangerous trap designed to incite violence and smear the reputation of migrants | Moral Condemnation 50%; Comparison with Elsewhere 14%; Personal Testimony 14% |
| Participation is a legitimate democratic right and a way to address real socio-economic grievances | Moral Condemnation 26%; Comparison with Elsewhere 17%; Plea or Demand 15% |
| Opposes the youth protests planned in Germany for 31 October 2026, without giving a reason | Moral Condemnation 41%; Plea or Demand 27%; Personal Testimony 9% |
| The protests will likely lead to widespread violence and riots similar to those in France | Comparison with Elsewhere 43%; Personal Testimony 21%; Moral Condemnation 20% |
| The far right (AfD) will exploit the protests to turn opinion against migrants | Moral Condemnation 45%; Plea or Demand 22%; Comparison with Elsewhere 14%; Personal Testimony 14% |
| The protests are irrelevant or unlikely to have a significant impact | Moral Condemnation 24%; Sarcasm and Ridicule 22%; Comparison with Elsewhere 16%; Personal Testimony 16% |
| Supports the youth protests planned in Germany for 31 October 2026, without giving a reason | Blessing or Greeting 50% |
Of the items holding each position, the share using each frame. An item can use more than one frame. Each row shows its three most used frames, more where tied; frames held by fewer than 3 of a position's items are left out. 1 of these groups holds fewer than 30 items (6), so each of its shares stands for a few comments, not a steady rate; any table that breaks a figure down by source, period or dialect shows no shares within such groups.
Frame descriptions
| Moral Condemnation | This frame appears in 23% of items, with commenters calling organisers or participants despicable or ungrateful, warning that outsiders will carry the Syrian flag and cause damage, and saying that guests owe respect to the country that took them in. |
| Blessing or Greeting | This frame appears in 19% of items, taking the form of thanks to a poster, prayers and wishes that Germany and everyone in it stay safe, and wishes that the day passes without trouble. |
| Sarcasm and Ridicule | This frame appears in 10% of items, with commenters mocking the stay-home and loyalty appeals as bootlicking, jeering at Syrians, Arabs and Muslims as thieves, and deriding one of the two guests in DW Arabic's video, those who would wave a national flag, and the idle "station lads" expected to turn out. |
| Plea or Demand | This frame appears in 9% of items, ranging from urging people to stay home, to calling on the German government to crack down on troublemakers, to repeated demands for immediate deportation. |
| Personal Testimony | This frame appears in 8% of items, with commenters speaking as a Syrian, a Kurd or a Palestinian, saying what Germany gave them, or saying what they will do on the day. |
| Comparison with Elsewhere | This frame appears in 6% of items, most often setting Germany beside the riots in France, or beside Syria and the countries commenters left; a few contrast Germany's right to protest with those places. |
| Insult and Abuse | This frame appears in 6% of items. Its definition: slurs, curses or name-calling aimed at a person or group. |
| Question | This frame appears in 5% of items. Its definition: asking for information or an explanation. |
| Economic Reasoning | This frame appears in 2% of items. Its definition: arguing from prices, costs, incomes or markets. |
This report has no "Discourse over time" section. That section compares episodes, surges of conversation: days with at least 20 items and three times the usual daily volume, grouped when they fall within three days of each other, 100 items or more in all. It looks for them only in a conversation longer than three weeks; this one spans 6 calendar days, too short for episodes. The volume chart below shows how it moved.
A post's stored time may not be when it was published: 185 comments carry a time earlier than their post's.
| Day | Volume | Tone |
|---|---|---|
| 20 October 2026 | 40 | 21%↑ 41%↓ |
| 21 October 2026 | 465 | 39%↑ 19%↓ |
| 22 October 2026 | 852 | 41%↑ 23%↓ |
| 23 October 2026 | 421 | 34%↑ 33%↓ |
| 24 October 2026 | 538 | 30%↑ 29%↓ |
| 25 October 2026 | 316 | 22%↑ 49%↓ |
Volume counts every dated item, those the audience did not write included. Tone shares divide by the audience's items on that day.
The items start at 18:47 UTC on 20 October and were collected for most posts on 25 October, before the day was out, so the first and last bars cover part of a day. Read the ends as partial, not as a ramp or a collapse.
% of items · language, or Arabic dialect where the text is Arabic
The bars above cover 2,251 of the 2,632 items (86%). The other 381: 101 published by the pages themselves, which carry no dialect; 42 with no text to read; 238 the report could not place in one of its six varieties: 138 unclear, 43 in other languages or varieties (German 37), 26 mixing two languages or varieties (most often MSA mixed with German) and 31 that are only a tagged name or a platform translation, not counted as English.
| Dialect | Items | Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation | Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany | Migrants, Syrians or Arabs are criminal or destructive and should be deported or go home | The protests are a dangerous trap designed to incite violence and smear the reputation of migrants | Participation is a legitimate democratic right and a way to address real socio-economic grievances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSA | 1,114 | 25% | 24% | 6% | 8% | 5% |
| Levantine | 921 | 23% | 10% | 13% | 11% | 7% |
| Gulf | 97 | 31% | 2% | 10% | 6% | 6% |
| Egyptian | 86 | 26% | 7% | 12% | 7% | 5% |
Share of each dialect group's items; groups under 30 items are left out.
MSA writers produce 42% of items and Levantine-speaking commenters 35%, while Gulf-dialect writers account for 4% and Egyptian-dialect writers for 3%. Tone differs sharply: 44% of Levantine items are negative in tone against 17% of MSA items, a ratio of 2.6 times, and MSA is the only large group with more positive items (47%) than negative ones. Tone does not show what people think, and the leading position is shared: that foreign residents and refugees should stay away from the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation comes first among Levantine items (23%), Gulf items (31%) and Egyptian items (26%), and among MSA items it is level with a moral duty of gratitude and loyalty to Germany (25% and 24%), a position that appears in 10% of Levantine items.
% of items with a known platform · where the item appeared
Facebook holds 59% of items, made up of 10 posts and 1,555 comments, while YouTube holds 41% of items, made up of 5 posts and 1,062 comments. Tone differs between them: 35% of Facebook items with a tone are negative and 28% positive, while on YouTube 19% are negative and 44% positive. Neutral tone is close on both, at 36% of Facebook items with a tone and 37% of YouTube items with a tone.
The five most-engaged accounts together drew 10% of the engagement on the audience's items, so engagement is not concentrated in a small group of accounts. Voice_1 drew the most engagement, 145, of which 136 on one neutral comment, and Voice_2 drew 69 with a negative tone; both hold the position that foreign residents and refugees should stay out of the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation. Voice_3, positive in tone, says no to violence and theft and wishes Germany peace, and Voice_5, also positive, argues that migrants owe it to Germany to stay away. Voice_4 is positive in tone; two of its comments oppose the protests without giving a reason, but 63 of its 64 likes are on one saying Germany helped everyone and should have peace. So the most-engaged accounts lean toward urging migrants not to take part. Voice_5 and Voice_13, the account that wrote the most, are the two accounts the authenticity scan found posting the same message repeatedly.
| Account | Platform | Items | Engagement | Share of Voice ⓘ | Main position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice_1 | YouTube | 4 | 145 | 3.6% | Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation |
| Voice_2 | 1 | 69 | 1.7% | Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation | |
| Voice_3 | YouTube | 2 | 65 | 1.6% | Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany |
| Voice_4 | YouTube | 5 | 64 | 1.6% | Opposes the youth protests planned in Germany for 31 October 2026, without giving a reason |
| Voice_5 | 7 | 57 | 1.4% | Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany | |
| Voice_6 | YouTube | 1 | 55 | 1.4% | No main position |
| Voice_7 | YouTube | 1 | 53 | 1.3% | Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany |
| Voice_8 | YouTube | 1 | 53 | 1.3% | Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany |
| Voice_9 | YouTube | 1 | 53 | 1.3% | Migrants have a moral obligation to avoid the protests as a sign of gratitude and loyalty to Germany |
| Voice_10 | YouTube | 4 | 49 | 1.2% | The protests are a dangerous trap designed to incite violence and smear the reputation of migrants |
| Voice_11 | YouTube | 9 | 9 | 0.2% | The protests are a dangerous trap designed to incite violence and smear the reputation of migrants |
| Voice_12 | YouTube | 9 | 7 | 0.2% | No main position |
| Voice_13 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | No main position |
Share of Voice: each account's engagement as a percentage of the engagement recorded across every item the audience wrote in this dataset. Engagement = likes and other reactions. Replies and shares are not counted. It is a share of the reactions these items drew, not of how much of the conversation an account wrote: the items column is that. The pages' own posts and replies drew 86% of all likes and are not in this table. The table lists the ten accounts with the most engagement, then three that wrote the most among the rest (Voice_11 to Voice_13): three of the rest wrote 9 items each, and the table keeps two.
The conversation began on 20 October 2026 with 40 items, all under one thread, and 41% of items that day carried a negative tone. Volume then jumped to 465 items on 21 October 2026 and peaked at 852 items on 22 October 2026. The first turning point came on 21 October 2026, when the negative share fell from 41% of items to 19% of items, and it stood at 23% of items on the peak day. Because a different post led the day on 21 October 2026 than on 20 October 2026, that drop reflects a change of thread and of the people writing, not a change of mind. After the peak, volume came in at 421 items on 23 October 2026, rose to 538 items on 24 October 2026, and fell to 316 items on 25 October 2026, a day collected only in part. The negative share stood at 33% of items on 23 October 2026 and 29% of items on 24 October 2026, then rose to 49% of items on 25 October 2026, the second turning point. A different post, from a Syrian community group in Essen, led that last day, so this rise belongs to that thread. The negative share moved 30 points across the 6 days, so the tone did not hold steady. For the client, the lifecycle is a fast build to a one-day peak, then 400 to 550 items a day with the last day only partly collected, and a tone that depends on which threads carry the conversation at the end.
Window: 20 October → 25 October 2026 (6 days). Peak: 22 October 2026 (852 items).
4 signals detected across the 2,531 items the audience wrote (the 2,489 counted in the other figures and 42 items with no text).
Not checked: uniform hashtags: fewer than 10 items carry hashtags.
Context: the 2,531 items the audience wrote average 20.3 items/hour across the 125 hours the items span.
The scanner fired 4 of the 5 indicators it could check, which gives a LOW rating. Some accounts repeated the same message, with 10 repeated items in all. Identical text appeared across 4 accounts, and one near-identical template appeared across 2 accounts: a begging appeal from "your sister from Yemen", unrelated to the protests. The repeats are one appeal for loyalty to Germany posted by Voice_5 under five posts, one reply posted by Voice_13 to five commenters, and two pasted thanks to Germany; variants of the begging appeal come from four accounts. That is a very small share of the set, and people can repeat the same slogan or reply for ordinary reasons, so this alone says little. Posting also came in 6 bursts, where many more accounts than usual were active in the same half-hour. These busy half-hours hold 26% of items. Every one of them falls soon after a post opened in this set, and bursts bunched into a short span like this match an audience arriving at a thread, so this indicator does not raise the rating. What the data cannot show is whether the accounts sharing these texts are linked; a person can check that on the platform. The hashtag uniformity check was not run, because too few items carry hashtags.
Prioritise tracking the 45% of items that hold a position opposing the youth protests planned in Germany for 31 October 2026 (against 5% that hold a position supporting them and none opposing), read by the reasons given rather than as one block. The reasons differ in kind: the legal-risk and deportation argument, the largest at 23% of items, is a practical caution, while the gratitude-and-loyalty argument, at 15% of items, is a moral one, so measure these 2 separately in later runs. Among items that state their reason outright, the order depends on how strictly that is read: the classifier marks 300 as stating the gratitude argument and 262 the legal-risk one, but about 50 of the 300 only thank, bless or respect Germany, and most of the 262 say to stay home or not to take part without naming a legal risk. The other 306 legal-risk items imply it, mostly by agreeing with a post that gave the warning. Re-run the analysis on later comments to see whether the balance between these reasons holds once 31 October has passed. The claims commenters make about legal consequences and about who is behind the protests are what this audience is saying, and they need verifying against official sources before anyone relies on them.
This report covers 20 October → 25 October 2026 and 2,632 items. Every share in it is a share of that window, so nothing here shows whether a figure is rising, falling or normal for this subject beyond this window. A second window, on later posts, gives a figure that can be called up or down, which a single window cannot.
Comments are quoted as written; see the content note in the Summary.
Each comment is shown whole, as collected, with a translation of the whole comment. Grouped by the first position each holds.
| # | Content | Platform | Shares | Dialect | Tone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🚨 تنبيه هام إلى أبناء الجالية السورية في ألمانيا وأوروبا 🇸🇾🇩🇪 تداولت أنباء عن دعوات للمشاركة في مظاهرات بتاريخ 30 و31 أكتوبر/تشرين الأول، دعت إليها بعض الأحزاب اليسارية في ألمانيا. نرجو من جميع … Important alert to the Syrian community in Germany and Europe: News has circulated regarding calls to participate in demonstrations on October 30 and 31, called for by some leftist parties in Germany. … | 436 | -- | -- | |
| 2 | مظاهرة السبت ما بتستاهل تخاطر بإقامتك ومستقبل عيلتك كرمالها. خليكم ببيوتكم! Saturday's protest is not worth risking your residency and your family's future for. Stay in your homes! | 95 | -- | -- | |
| 3 | حملة الولاء لألمانيا من جانب السوريين قاطعوا جميع الدعوات للتظاهر في ألمانيا يوم 31 أكتوبر، فحماية أمن ألمانيا وسلامها واجبٌ علينا. يرجى التعميم على اوسع نطاق A loyalty campaign for Germany by Syrians: Boycott all calls to demonstrate in Germany on October 31st, for protecting the security and peace of Germany is our duty. Please circulate this as widely as possible. | 22 | -- | -- |
Posts by the pages this conversation was collected from carry no tone or dialect here, as everywhere else in this report: they are the pages speaking, not the audience.
Germany draws the most attention, named in 552 items, followed by Europe with 106, France with 79 and Khaled Bozan with 76. Syria follows with 66 items. Led by the views recorded toward each name, the leading sentiment toward Germany, Khaled Bozan, Germans, Palestine and Maro is positive (349, 56, 16, 8 and 20 items), and toward Europe, France, Syria, Syrians and AfD negative (24, 30, 20, 11 and 19 items). By item tone alone, items naming France lean neutral (47 neutral, 23 negative). No entity in the table is mixed, though Palestine's lead is thin (8 against 6 neutral), as is Europe's (24 against 18 neutral).
| Entity | Type | Mentions | Leading sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany (ألمانيا) | Location | 552 | Positive |
| Europe (أوروبا) | Location | 106 | Negative |
| France (فرنسا) | Location | 79 | Negative |
| Khaled Bozan (خالد بوزان) | Person | 76 | Positive |
| Syria (سوريا) | Location | 66 | Negative |
| Syrians (السوريين) | Group | 34 | Negative |
| Germans (الألمان) | Group | 33 | Positive |
| Palestine (فلسطين) | Location | 25 | Positive |
| AfD | Organisation | 23 | Negative |
| Maro (مارو) | Person | 22 | Positive |
Mentions: items in which the classifier listed the entity; a word search can find more. Leading sentiment: the view the classifier recorded toward the entity, where it recorded at least five. With fewer, the recorded view where there is one, otherwise the tone of the item that names it. A view and a tone can differ: a comment angry at those who insulted someone is negative in tone and positive toward him. Mixed means the leader led the runner-up by a fifth or less.
| Label | Question | Example from this report | How it is set |
|---|---|---|---|
| Position | What does the comment claim? | “Foreign residents and refugees should not participate in the protests to avoid legal risks and deportation” | From a list proposed from the data and approved by the analyst before any comment is classified. A comment can hold several positions, or none. |
| Theme | What is it about? | Integration and Gratitude | Neutral topics drawn from this conversation. A theme names a subject, never a verdict on it; verdicts are positions. |
| Frame | How does it argue? | Moral Condemnation | One fixed set of eleven ways of arguing (ridicule, insult, moral condemnation, religious citation, personal testimony, economic reasoning, expertise, comparison, plea, question, greeting), defined the same way in every report so frames can be compared across reports. |
| Tone | How does it sound? | Positive, negative or neutral | The emotional register of the comment itself, whatever it is about: a blessing is positive, an insult negative. Tone is not a view of the subject; that is what positions record. |
For and against are not asked of the model. The analyst tags each position as supporting, opposing or neither; a comment counts as for or against from the positions it holds.
Classification, writing and translation use a number of the latest frontier language models.
According to our internal evaluation, the classification of dialect and tone is between 80 and 90 percent accurate. Read a difference of a few points between two figures as no difference.
Some comments contain offensive language: insults, slurs and attacks on groups or individuals. The platforms and their moderation left these comments up, so they are part of the conversation this report describes: they are counted with every other comment, and some appear among the quoted examples, reproduced as collected, so that a position is shown as its holders put it. The language and content of the comments do not reflect the views of the Discursa team, and the team does not endorse them.